
Referencia:
Weather Geekery
"No, Señor. No hay una Iluminación Perfecta que alcanzar. Señor, si un Buddha Perfectamente Iluminado se dijera, 'así soy yo', estaría admitiendo una identidad individual, un yo y una personalidad independientes, y en tal caso no sería un Buddha Perfectamente Iluminado."
Referencia: Buda: Sus enseñanzas en español



As Stallman (Free Software, Free Society; pp. 190-191) said, calling it piracy implies that unauthorized copying is tantamount to armed robbery, kidnap, and murder on the high seas. They both involve theft of a sort -- but are vastly different. Copyright infringement generally involves cheating someone out of their rightful royalties; piracy involves depriving sailors and their employers of life, liberty, or property (maybe all three!) without due process of law. I'd say that copyright infringement is not morally tantamount to this.From ultranova:
For those who can't tell the difference between real criminal conspiracies and copyright infringers:If we go by the nature of the crime, the entire "pirate" metaphor is off, at least in the digital domain. It seems like "Robin Hood" is more accurate. Steal from the rich to give to the poor. One Slashdotter, some guy i know, disagrees:
* Real criminal conspiracies rob, extort and kill, which directly harms real human beings.
* Copyright infringers distribute music, movies and programs without permission from copyright holders, which may or may not affect the financial bottom line of big media corporations, and might or might not cause their stockholders to not get as much profit as they would otherwise, for an undeterminable amount.
If you think that you are comparing these "pirates" (i.e., massive copyright violators) with Robin Hood, then you're wrong.But most of the time music labels, not artists, own the copyrights to many songs. They, not artists, are profiting of the musical enterprise. If anything, "merry men," as I'll refer to "pirates" from now on, fight against unfair enforcement of copyright laws. To further the Robin Hood metaphor, illegal music distributors take from the "haves" and give to the "have nots," in this case, the good in question is music, whereas in the Robin Hood mythos, the good was money.
Robin Hood didn't take from the rich and give to the poor; he took from the tax collectors and gave to the taxed.
Now, it turns out that most of the taxed were poor and most of the tax collectors were rich (or those working for the rich), but Robin Hood did not steal from, say, merchants and traders, who were better-off than average, nor did he give to beggars, who were worse-off than average.
Robin Hood should be romanticized because he fought against unfair taxation, not because of the rich-to-poor myth.
1. THE INSIDERIdeas for the future
Industry and theater employees run their own straight-to-video operations. Hackers looking for prerelease videogames target company servers. And before that long-awaited CD hits Amazon.com, moles inside disc-stamping plants have already got a copy.
2. THE PACKAGER
The pirated goods are passed on to a release group. These groups take multi-gigabyte movie files and squeeze them down for easy online trading.
3. THE DISTRIBUTOR
Release groups are known to have exclusive relationships with certain so-called topsites. These are the highly secretive sites at the top of the distribution pyramid. When a topsite operator drops a file, the avalanche begins.
4. THE COURIERS
Alerted by release groups, worker bees spring into action, copying and transferring files from the topsites to lower-level dump sites, and then from there to P2P networks like Kazaa and Morpheus. For the couriers, the payoff is props from their peers and credits redeemable for goods on upper levels of the pyramid.
5. THE PUBLIC
After the file is copied thousands of times the P2P networks saturate, allowing casual file-traders easy access to the newest movies, music, and videogames.